Skip to content
Per Square Metre

Per Square Metre

Payer-side FHIR architecture: Da Vinci IG adoption, analytics stacks, and payer platform engineering notes.

  • Terminology server
  • Medical form builder
  • Master patient index

Category: Fhir Platform Architecture

Top 6 FHIR Data Store Patterns for Reusable Compliance Investment

Top 6 FHIR Data Store Patterns for Reusable Compliance Investment

The FHIR data store is the architectural decision that determines whether CMS-0057-F compliance becomes a reusable platform investment or stays…

Top 5 PostgreSQL-Based FHIR Engines for 2026

Top 5 PostgreSQL-Based FHIR Engines for 2026

PostgreSQL has become the default storage substrate for production FHIR platforms in 2026. The JSONB column type stores FHIR resources…

Top 5 FHIR-Native Platforms for Health Plans in 2026

Top 5 FHIR-Native Platforms for Health Plans in 2026

A FHIR-native platform is one where FHIR is the canonical data model, not a translation layer over existing systems. For…

Top 5 Cloud-Native FHIR Hosting Options for US Health Payers

Top 5 Cloud-Native FHIR Hosting Options for US Health Payers

Cloud-native FHIR hosting reduces operational burden substantially for health plans that do not have strong on-premise infrastructure or specific data-residency…

The Complete Guide to FHIR Platform Architecture for CMS-0057-F

The Complete Guide to FHIR Platform Architecture for CMS-0057-F

FHIR platform architecture is the part of CMS-0057-F that gets less attention than the API endpoints but determines more of…

FHIR-Native vs Compliance Gateway: Architectural Trade-Offs for CMS-0057-F

FHIR-Native vs Compliance Gateway: Architectural Trade-Offs for CMS-0057-F

The architectural choice between a FHIR-native stack and a compliance gateway determines what the CMS-0057-F investment becomes three years from…

Cloud-Hosted vs Self-Hosted FHIR Platforms for CMS-0057-F

Cloud-Hosted vs Self-Hosted FHIR Platforms for CMS-0057-F

The deployment model for the CMS-0057-F FHIR platform is one of the choices that gets less attention than vendor selection…

Best On-Premise FHIR Platforms for Regulated Payer Deployments

Best On-Premise FHIR Platforms for Regulated Payer Deployments

On-premise FHIR hosting remains relevant for US health payers with specific regulatory, data-residency, or operational requirements that cloud-native managed services…

Best Multi-Tenant FHIR Hosting Models for Payer Workloads in 2026

Best Multi-Tenant FHIR Hosting Models for Payer Workloads in 2026

Multi-tenant FHIR hosting matters for any health plan that supports multiple lines of business, multiple delegated entities, or multiple regulatory…

5 FHIR Storage Anti-Patterns That Hurt CMS-0057-F Performance

5 FHIR Storage Anti-Patterns That Hurt CMS-0057-F Performance

FHIR storage design has predictable failure modes that surface under production CMS-0057-F load. The anti-patterns below produce systems that pass…

Fixing broken refs?

Fixing broken refs?

Debugging a Bundle full of broken references? a Bundle reference walker parked here will find the culprits.

Recent Posts

  • Contained References vs External References: Cost and Safety
  • Resolving FHIR References Without a Full Database Walk
  • FHIR Search Performance Across 4 Servers: A First Look at the Numbers
  • Top 6 FHIR Data Store Patterns for Reusable Compliance Investment
  • Top 6 Da Vinci IGs Every Health Plan Should Track in 2026

Categories

  • Da Vinci Ecosystem
  • Fhir Platform Architecture
  • Master patient index
  • Medical form builder
  • Payer Side Analytics Ai
  • Reference Resolver
  • Terminology server

Copyright © 2025